look at our pretty new shoes. the blue ones are mine. i've had them for a couple weeks. i wear them around the house and on weekends. not to work. kara just got hers a few days ago. it surprised me a little when she got them because of her intense aversion to most things plastic. she's not totally fond of them but i think they're growing on her. not literally. they're strangely comfortable.
i am reading "saturday" and enjoying it mightily. the writing is good. i have been iffy on mcewan before, but thus far i like this one. here's a passage i read yesterday (from page 68 of my paperback anchor books edition) that struck me:
No one's been in the kitchen since he left it. On the table are his cup, Theo's empty mineral water bottle and, beside it, the remote control. It's still faintly surprising, this rigid fidelity of objects, sometimes reassuring, sometimes sinister.
this totally rang true for me. i think of this, when i put something down, a blanket, a shoe, and return the next day to find it in exactly the same place. why should this be a surprise? i don't actually expect it to move on its own. all the same, it does strike me sometimes as disconcerting, sad, lonely.
of course the emotions are considerably deeper when i consider (forgive me my macabre thought processes) bodies in the hospital morgue, which i sometimes still do, even though it's been over a year since i had a job that (very occasionally) took me there. the bodies remain there on their gurneys, cold and quiet and still, until someone comes to move them. it is sad, and a little creepy.
speaking of cold, quiet, and still, thanks for asking, as far as my own writing goes, i am woefully impotent, involved in inertia and debate.
on the one hand i am enamored with the romantic notion of producing a slender volume of poems. (it does not help that the daughter of the main character in "saturday" is expecting the imminent publication of her first such volume.) i picture myself with a slight, but brilliant, sheaf. how elegant!
on the other hand the equally romantic notion of immersing myself deep within the layered construction of a 200,000-word novel also compels me.
in the meantime, obviously, i am accomplishing nothing. it's true that fiction comes easier for me. sentences and paragraphs emerge more readily than do stanzas. when i sit down to write a poem i feel i'm forcing it, and that of course does not work. still, i feel i am on the cusp of writing. golly by gosh, how lame does that sound? what's more pathetic than a would-be anything? be this as it may, pretty words and lyrical phrases swim in my head. i have lists. i am also awash with first names that are for whatever reason pregnant in my eyes (sorry) with portent and character.
among those names is "swati." i knew a girl named swati in high school, had a bit of a crush on her, i'm not ashamed to say, 17 years after the fact. her twin sister was archana. the gupta sisters. i wonder where they are now. swati or archana gupta, wootton high school class of 1989, where are you?
appropos of nothing (or not - you judge), mr mcewan teaches me a new word on page 74: anosognosia. i like this word; mcewan defines it more broadly as a lack of awareness of one's own condition. please, consider this paragraph appropos of nothing.
by the bye, this post is dedicated to jay. jay's name was chosen from those who sent in the correct answer to my quiz last week. actually, it wasn't really a quiz, just a question, and jay was the only one who responded at all. still, i believe his answer is correct. way to go jay! this one's for you.